Malaysia’s Draft Biological Resources Access & Benefits Law Open For Comment

This week Malaysia’s Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) published for public review and comment a draft Access to Biological Resources and Benefit Sharing Act. The bill is intended to implement the provisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) regarding access to and sharing of benefits from the utilization of biological resources. Comments may be submitted electronically here until October 7, 2012.

MALAYSIA’S COMMITMENTS REGARDING BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Malaysia, identified by Conservation International as one of 17 “megadiverse” countries collectively containing 70% or more of the earth’s marine, freshwater, and terrestrial biological diversity, ratified the CBD in 1994. Like most CBD signatories, to date it has not enacted comprehensive legislation to implement the convention. Malaysia also has not signed the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization, a supplementary agreement to the CBD, which is intended to provide greater legal certainty regarding the convention’s access and benefit sharing provisions. However, the draft Act clearly draws upon much of the philosophy underlying the Nagoya Protocol.

The proposed Malaysian access and benefit sharing law spans 60 pages. Some of its features are described below.

Coat of Arms of Malaysia

SCOPE OF THE ACT. The draft law applies to “biological resources,” which are defined using almost the same definition that is contained in the CBD. In addition to the CBD definition, the term includes “derivatives,” as defined in the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization, except that in the Malaysian draft law, “derivatives” also include “information in relation” chemical compounds that are subject to the law.


REGULATION OF ACCESS. The Act regulates the obtaining of “access” to biological resources, which means taking them for research and development purposes from their natural habitat or a place where they are found, kept, or grown. For this purpose, “research and development” means “the study or systematic investigation or technological application by analyzing, sampling, bioassaying, and inventorising or other methods for any purpose including taxonomic research and potential commercial product development.”

One who wishes to obtain access to a biological resource must apply to a “Competent Authority.” The rules that govern applying for permission to access a biological resource differ, depending on whether the intended use of the resource is commercial or non-commercial. In this context, “non-commercial” means “pure academic and non-profit oriented.” When the applicant seeks access for non-commercial research purposes, the law requires that the research be conducted “in collaboration with a public higher education institution, public research institution, or government agency,” unless the competent Authority decides otherwise. In any case, the applicant must have obtained the prior informed consent of any relevant indigenous and local community for access to–

  • Biological resources on land to which the community has a right as established by law; and
  • Traditional knowledge associated with the resource that is held by the community.

The applicant must also have entered into a benefit sharing agreement with the resource provider, which must be based upon mutually agreed terms and must provide for fair and equitable benefit sharing.

EXCEPTIONS TO THE ACCESS RULES. The access rules do not apply to genetically modified organisms that are protected by intellectual property, to plant varieties that are protected by plant breeders’ rights, or to a small farmer that is exercising his right under the Malaysian Plant Varieties Act to save, use, exchange, and sell farm-saved seed or propagating material. 1

GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL OF ACCESS. The draft Act requires the Competent Authority to refuse an application for access to a biological resource under certain enumerated circumstances, including when–

  • The application relates to threatened taxa or endemic and rare species;
  • The access is likely to cause adverse effects to the livelihood or cultural practices of indigenous and local communities;
  • The applicant seeks access to human genetic resources “for purposes contrary to ethical values;” or
  • The “use of the biological resource is for purposes associated with genetic use restriction technology.”


No person shall apply for intellectual property rights, whether in or outside Malaysia, in relation to the biological resources or traditional knowledge associated with biological resources accessed without the written consent of the Competent Authority.

CRIMINAL PENALTIES.Many violations of the Act would be punishable as crimes. For example, to access biological resources or traditional knowledge associated with the resource without a permit is designated as a serious offense. For individuals, the punishment is a fine of no less than 50,000 rinngt up to 200,000 ringgt (approx. US$16,270 to US$65,080 or €12,590 to €50,390) and/or a prison term of up to five years. Juridical entities that violate the access provisions are subject to a fine ranging between 100,000 ringgit and 400,000 ringgit (approx. US$32,540 to US$130,170 or €25,190 to €100,780). Similarly, a violation of Section  27 regarding intellectual property rights would be punishable by up to four years in prison and a fine up to 100,000 ringgit (approx. US$32,600 or   €25,190) for individuals, and a fine up to 200,000 ringgit (approx. US$65,220 or €50,390) for juridical entities.

 by Shawn N. Sullivan, Sept. 27, 2012.

Print Friendly    Send article as PDF   
This entry was posted in Biotechnology Law, Environmental Law, Intellectual Property Law, Science Policy and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.